<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do you Measure a Startup?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/</link>
	<description>a perspective as seen from the trenches.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaushik</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>The SAI process looks good but i have an issue with such a strong emphasis on financial metrics to be used as part of valuating a startup like they seem to indicate. My question then would be if the companies do indeed have predictable financial metrics when do they stop being a startup and enter the regular space ?? There has to be some additional soft metrics to be taken into consideration ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SAI process looks good but i have an issue with such a strong emphasis on financial metrics to be used as part of valuating a startup like they seem to indicate. My question then would be if the companies do indeed have predictable financial metrics when do they stop being a startup and enter the regular space ?? There has to be some additional soft metrics to be taken into consideration ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3270</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3270</guid>
		<description>Nice discussion. Kausik, very good notes.

Gabhijit, fair points.

Will wait for some more responses and will summarize on this.

What do you guys think about what SAI is doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice discussion. Kausik, very good notes.</p>
<p>Gabhijit, fair points.</p>
<p>Will wait for some more responses and will summarize on this.</p>
<p>What do you guys think about what SAI is doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaushik</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3269</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 07:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3269</guid>
		<description>More of a question here, would this by any different   from the way current valuations take place for early stage companies to evaluate investments for seed/early stage funding. 

In that case the common parameters that apply in such case would still apply:
1. Market Size: Critical factor, what is the total addressable market. Is a key factor for valuation.
2. Team/Background: Teams with a background in the space, previous successful records will get significantly higher  valuations.

I did not find any standardized approaches for this but there are a few interesting approaches from some companies: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/57116/


They use &quot;initial public offerings and acquisitions of similar technologies or operating companies applied to future company cash flows or liquidity events, modified by present valuing techniques&quot; .. for valuation. So compare with others in a similar space. I guess this will not work if it is something really not done before.

The have some good docs on this here:
http://www.cogentvaluation.com/con_services_ESInvestmentValuation.cfm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of a question here, would this by any different   from the way current valuations take place for early stage companies to evaluate investments for seed/early stage funding. </p>
<p>In that case the common parameters that apply in such case would still apply:<br />
1. Market Size: Critical factor, what is the total addressable market. Is a key factor for valuation.<br />
2. Team/Background: Teams with a background in the space, previous successful records will get significantly higher  valuations.</p>
<p>I did not find any standardized approaches for this but there are a few interesting approaches from some companies: <a href="http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/57116/" rel="nofollow">http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/57116/</a></p>
<p>They use &#8220;initial public offerings and acquisitions of similar technologies or operating companies applied to future company cash flows or liquidity events, modified by present valuing techniques&#8221; .. for valuation. So compare with others in a similar space. I guess this will not work if it is something really not done before.</p>
<p>The have some good docs on this here:<br />
<a href="http://www.cogentvaluation.com/con_services_ESInvestmentValuation.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cogentvaluation.com/con_services_ESInvestmentValuation.cfm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabhijit</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>gabhijit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 06:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Vijay, I thought initially of replying to this post inline, but subsequently I realized that the thoughts that I have are suitable for a blog post itself. If interested, please follow the following link as a comment. Though I must admit, this goes way beyond &quot;web 2.0 startups&quot; per say!! 

http://oltsm.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/on-startups-and-aims/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vijay, I thought initially of replying to this post inline, but subsequently I realized that the thoughts that I have are suitable for a blog post itself. If interested, please follow the following link as a comment. Though I must admit, this goes way beyond &#8220;web 2.0 startups&#8221; per say!! </p>
<p><a href="http://oltsm.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/on-startups-and-aims/" rel="nofollow">http://oltsm.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/on-startups-and-aims/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Startups, AIMS and Social Networks &#171; Abhijit Speaks :</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3265</link>
		<dc:creator>On Startups, AIMS and Social Networks &#171; Abhijit Speaks :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 06:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3265</guid>
		<description>[...] How do you measure a startup? Instead of trying to answer in a straight-forward manner, I&#8217;d take my usual convoulted way - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How do you measure a startup? Instead of trying to answer in a straight-forward manner, I&#8217;d take my usual convoulted way &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prashant Trivedi</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant Trivedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>First measure of success for a startup is that how long founders remain motivated to run the startup.

There are few other metrics that could be used for startups:

(1). Burn rate - For all businesses
(2). How does start up compare with projected   values in business plan 
  . Active Users (for Web2.0 companies)
  . Design wins and revenue  (product companies)
  . customer wins (service companies)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First measure of success for a startup is that how long founders remain motivated to run the startup.</p>
<p>There are few other metrics that could be used for startups:</p>
<p>(1). Burn rate &#8211; For all businesses<br />
(2). How does start up compare with projected   values in business plan<br />
  . Active Users (for Web2.0 companies)<br />
  . Design wins and revenue  (product companies)<br />
  . customer wins (service companies)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilip P</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilip P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>//Alright, good point, but when it comes to the case of “Web 2.0″ startups, userbase is a very easy stat to go with.

It&#039;s true only in certain cases.. A very good example where it failed was in the case of twitter. Twitter valued its user base much lower than the actual, cos majority of the users use mobile or other clients to send Tweets and it wasn&#039;t possible for them to track it all... I&#039;d say user base should be left out while measuring a web startup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>//Alright, good point, but when it comes to the case of “Web 2.0″ startups, userbase is a very easy stat to go with.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true only in certain cases.. A very good example where it failed was in the case of twitter. Twitter valued its user base much lower than the actual, cos majority of the users use mobile or other clients to send Tweets and it wasn&#8217;t possible for them to track it all&#8230; I&#8217;d say user base should be left out while measuring a web startup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3261</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3261</guid>
		<description>Shivaas, thats what &quot;Product review&quot; would be :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shivaas, thats what &#8220;Product review&#8221; would be <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivaas Gulati</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3260</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivaas Gulati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3260</guid>
		<description>How about measuring user satisfaction ? does the application/startup deliver on what it promises to deliver, and score a 10 on 10 for the consumer ? 
I think that will be a good metric to measure a startup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about measuring user satisfaction ? does the application/startup deliver on what it promises to deliver, and score a 10 on 10 for the consumer ?<br />
I think that will be a good metric to measure a startup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/how-do-you-measure-a-startup/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijaysblog.wordpress.com/?p=188#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>Alright, good point, but when it comes to the case of &quot;Web 2.0&quot; startups, userbase is a very easy stat to go with.

I am going to assume that we live in a world where there are startups that are not totally &quot;web 2.0&quot; compliant. Lets keep the discussions around that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, good point, but when it comes to the case of &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; startups, userbase is a very easy stat to go with.</p>
<p>I am going to assume that we live in a world where there are startups that are not totally &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; compliant. Lets keep the discussions around that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
